![High Court provides guidance on interpretation of 'obscure disclosure' exception - World Trademark Review High Court provides guidance on interpretation of 'obscure disclosure' exception - World Trademark Review](https://files.lbr.cloud/237797/5f515f77-c475-4642-837d-1005b3b68596.png)
High Court provides guidance on interpretation of 'obscure disclosure' exception - World Trademark Review
![Designers beware: UK Supreme Court confirms that images alone will determine the scope of registered design protection | The National Law Review Designers beware: UK Supreme Court confirms that images alone will determine the scope of registered design protection | The National Law Review](http://www.iptechblog.com/files/2016/03/untitled.png)
Designers beware: UK Supreme Court confirms that images alone will determine the scope of registered design protection | The National Law Review
![Designers beware: UK Supreme Court confirms that images alone will determine the scope of registered design protection | The National Law Review Designers beware: UK Supreme Court confirms that images alone will determine the scope of registered design protection | The National Law Review](http://www.iptechblog.com/files/2016/03/12image001.gif)
Designers beware: UK Supreme Court confirms that images alone will determine the scope of registered design protection | The National Law Review
Action [fanpagina voor de action] - Ik ga op reis en neem mee..... wat zou jij meenemen in deze schattige koffer? Coreije Delger schrijft: Heej hoi Ria, Vorig jaar wilde ik een
![High Court provides guidance on interpretation of 'obscure disclosure' exception - World Trademark Review High Court provides guidance on interpretation of 'obscure disclosure' exception - World Trademark Review](https://files.lbr.cloud/237796/a04bc625-a7e7-491f-ae6d-e1c74a4c8ce1.png)